The morphology features of bone marrow in the prefibrotic-early primary myelofibrosis / 中华血液学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the morphologic features of bone marrow (BM) between the prefibrotic-early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and essential thrombocythaemia (ET).</p><p><b>METHOD</b>Seven cases of prefibrotic-early PMF were selected and analyzed. Based on the diagnostic standard of prefibrotic-early PMF by WHO, BM aspirate smears, trephine biopsy sections and imprints of 156 uncertain ET cases conducted simultaneously were recruited into this study, the BM morphologic features between the prefibrotic-early PMF and ET groups were analyzed. The morphological difference in 22 cases of prefibrotic-early PMF and 27 ET were compared between the JAK2V617F mutation positive and negative groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of the 156 uncertain ET cases, it was reclassified 61 prefibrotic-early PMF (34 MF-0, 27 MF-1), 12 PMF and 83 ET. The platelet count and LDH level in MF-1 group were obviously higher than that of ET group (P < 0.05). The blast percentage of BM smear in MF-1 group was also higher than that of ET group (P < 0.05). As to BM section, cases with increased nucleated cells (granulocyte), compact megakaryocytic cluster, megakaryocyte near bone trabecula, cloud-like megakaryocyte, small bare nucleus of megakaryocyte and large ball-like megakaryocyte in MF-0 and MF-1 group were significantly higher than that of ET group (all P < 0.05), cases with megakaryocytic cluster of various size in MF-1 group were significantly higher than that of MF-0 and ET groups (P < 0.05). The JAK2V617F mutation rate in prefibrotic-early PMF and ET groups were 54.5% and 48.1%, respectively. Hb level in JAK2V617F mutation positive group was obviously higher than the negative group (P < 0.05), no special change with megakaryocytic morphology was found between the positive and negative groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Morphology of BM section, especially megakaryocytic morphologic characteristics are the main basis in distinguishing prefibrotic-early PMF from ET. The importance of morphologic index were megakaryocytic cluster with various size, cloud-like megakaryocyte, large ball-like megakaryocyte, increased nucleated cells (granulocyte), small bare nucleus, megakaryocyte near bone trabecula and compact megakaryocytic cluster in order. JAK2V617F mutation provides no specific effect on the megakaryocytic morphology.</p>

Expression of GADD153 in follicular tumors of thyroid and comparison with CK19, Galectin-3 and HBME-1 / 中华病理学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study immunohistochemical expression of GADD153 and assess its usefulness as markers in the differential diagnoses in follicular tumors of the thyroid.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Immunohistochemical staining was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue of 34 cases of follicular thyroid adenomas (FTA), 46 cases of follicular thyroid carcinomas (FTC), 29 cases of follicular variant papillary carcinomas (FVPC).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>(1) GADD153 was expressed in cell nucleus with positive or strong positive expression in FTC, and no or weak expression in FTA and FVPC. The positive expressions of GADD153 were present in 38 of 46(82.6%) in FTC, 11 of 34(32.4%) in FTA and three of 29(10.3%) in FVPC, the positive expression rate in FTC was obviously higher than that in FTA and in FVPC, the differences were statistically significant (χ² = 20.80 and 37.48; P < 0.01). (2) CK19, Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and HBME-1 were all expressed in the cytoplasm, the positive expressions of CK19, Gal-3 and HBME-1 were present in 54.3% (25/46), 67.4% (31/46) and 58.7% (27/46) in FTC; 50.0% (17/34), 29.4% (10/34) and 32.4% (11/34) in FTA; 100% (29/29), 93.1% (27/29) and 89.7% (26/29) in FVPC, the differences were statistically significant as well (χ² = 21.20 and 8.22; P < 0.01). (3) According to the expressions of CK19, Gal-3, HBME-1 and GADD153, we divided the results into low expression group (0 or 1+) and high expression group (2+ or 3+), the sensitivity and the specificity were calculated. in FTA, the sensitivity were 26.5%, 8.8%, 2.9% and 11.8%; the specificity were 50.7%, 52.0%, 54.7% and 58.7%. in FTC, the sensitivity were 19.6%, 26.1%, 23.9% and 65.2%; the specificity were 41.3%, 57.1%, 62.0% and 92.1%. in FVPC, the sensitivity were 96.6%, 82.8%, 79.3% and 3.4%; the specificity were 77.5%, 81.3%, 85.0% and 57.5%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The sensitivity and the specificity of GADD153 expression are well for diagnosing FTC, and CK19, Gal-3, HBME-1 are well for FVPC. The four markers when used in combination, are better to identify the follicular tumors of the thyroid.</p>